Skip to main content
< Solutions

Secure AI

Build AI governance that engineers actually follow

Assess AI security risks, architect governance frameworks, and manage ongoing AI safety. Multi-framework methodology for production AI systems.

The Journey

1

Assess

Risk Discovery

Identify AI security risks, shadow AI usage, and maturity gaps.

EU AI Act Risk Classification
AI/LLM Penetration Testing
Shadow AI Discovery
AI Maturity Assessment

D3 Cyber Services

2

Architect

Governance Design

Build AI governance frameworks, policies, and security architecture.

AI Acceptable Use Policy
Security Verification Checklists
Model Selection Framework

D3 Cyber Services

3

Manage

Lifecycle Control

Active AI safety monitoring and review, incident response, and cost optimization.

Ongoing Safety Evaluation
AI Incident Response
Agentic Runtime Governance

D3 Cyber Services

The AI Security Lifecycle

A structured approach to deploying AI safely - from risk discovery to continuous governance.

1

Phase 1: Assess

Weeks 1-6

Discovery & Testing

  • AI/LLM Penetration Testing
  • Shadow AI Discovery (Unsanctioned Tools)
  • EU AI Act Risk Classification

Maturity Baseline

  • AI Maturity Assessment (AIMA)
  • Gap Analysis Against Industry Benchmarks
  • Prioritized Improvement Roadmap
2

Phase 2: Architect

Months 2-3

Policy & Framework

  • AI Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
  • Multi-Framework Governance Framework
  • Data Classification for AI Consumption

Security Architecture

  • AISVS Security Requirements (L1-L3)
  • Model Sovereignty & Selection Governance
  • Deterministic Policy Kernels for Agents
3

Phase 3: Manage

Ongoing

Ongoing Monitoring

  • Quarterly Red-Team Exercises
  • Model Drift & Output Quality Tracking
  • Bias Detection and Alerting

Lifecycle & Compliance

  • AI Incident Response Playbooks
  • Continuous Safety Evaluation (AISVS, AIMA)
  • ISO 42001 AIMS Certification Support
  • Agentic Runtime Governance & Policy Audit

Why do I need Secure AI?

AI is an accelerator. Without brakes, it's just a crash waiting to happen.

The rapid adoption of GenAI has outpaced traditional security controls. According to recent industry research, 73% of organizations deploying LLMs have at least one critical vulnerability. Employees are pasting sensitive data into public chatbots, autonomous agents are making business decisions without oversight, and nobody knows who owns the model after the POC team leaves.

Governance isn't about blocking innovation. It's about building the guardrails that allow you to deploy AI fast without creating existential business risks.

The AI Governance Reality

  • 1

    Visibility: You can't secure Shadow AI you don't know exists.

  • 2

    Compliance: EU AI Act fines reach 7% of global turnover for High-risk systems.

  • 3

    Maintainability: POC-to-production AI systems break within 6 months.

Data Privacy
Ad-hoc AI Adoption

Company secrets pasted into public ChatGPT

Governed AI Program

Enterprise instances with zero-retention policies

Security Testing
Ad-hoc AI Adoption

No understanding of AI-specific vulnerability patterns

Governed AI Program

Regular red-team exercises against agentic workflows

Cost Control
Ad-hoc AI Adoption

Opus-class models for email triage (wasteful spending)

Governed AI Program

Model right-sizing and inference cost forecasting

Incident Response
Ad-hoc AI Adoption

No playbooks for prompt injection or data poisoning

Governed AI Program

AI-specific incident classification and EU AI Act reporting

We don't block innovation. We partner with you to build safely.

The D3 Perspective

Field observations from securing AI systems in production.

Engineering Reality Over Policy Theater

An AI policy buried in SharePoint is worse than no policy. Engineers ignore unenforceable rules, and developers will continue pasting proprietary code into public tools if governance is divorced from their engineering workflow. We build governance integrated into CI/CD pipelines, using technical controls rather than written rules to make security the default.

Agentic Guardrails vs. Prompt Theater

Prompt-based safety is probabilistic and easily bypassed. Real agentic security requires deterministic runtime governance - a "security kernel" that intercepts tool calls and resource access before they execute. We architect systems where agents operate within hard privilege boundaries, ensuring autonomous actions don't turn into unauthorized access.

Human Oversight & Silent Failure Monitoring

AI systems fail quietly - they make plausible-sounding but incorrect decisions. When SOC teams or incident responders stop investigating because the AI summary looks right, you have a cognitive dependency problem. We build monitoring that detects silent agentic anomalies and train teams to verify AI outputs rather than trusting them blindly.

Lifecycle Ownership & Maintenance

AI systems often break within six months because the POC team disbands, leaving nobody to manage model drift or API changes. Governance means defining lifecycle ownership and maintenance workflows before deployment, not after failure. We ensure AI production systems remain maintainable and monitored long after the initial ship date.

EU AI ACT

The Sovereignty
Imperative

The EU AI Act and GDPR have fundamentally changed the landscape. Using non-compliant US-based models for European citizen data is no longer a grey area - it's a liability. Directors can be held personally accountable for algorithmic failures. According to a 2025 study, 68% of organizations using AI have unsanctioned tool usage they're unaware of.

Up to 7%
Of Global Turnover (EU AI Act Fines)

Why D3 for AI Security?

We test AI systems, not just talk about them. We build governance that engineers actually follow.

  • We Test AI Systems: Full AI/LLM security coverage, not just automated scans.
  • Framework Contributors: We contribute to global AI security projects. Field-tested methodology.
  • Vendor Agnostic: Anthropic, OpenAI, open-weight, or sovereign - we recommend what fits your use case.

Why D3 Cyber?

We Test AI, Not Just Talk

We test production AI systems against global security standards, not just written policies. We understand agentic attack chains, MCP server abuse vectors, and prompt injection vulnerabilities in complex tool-calling environments.

Governance That Engineers Follow

We build governance integrated into CI/CD pipelines, using deterministic policy kernels rather than just written rules. We implement technical guardrails that enforce security without slowing down development teams.

Field Perspective

We understand what breaks in production - from POCs that fail within 6 months to silent agentic failures. We prevent these patterns by implementing policy-as-code kernels that intercept and validate autonomous actions.

Regulatory Intelligence

We align requirements across global standards: EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and the OWASP AI security ecosystem. Not just theory - we provide field-tested implementations for high-risk AI systems.

Vendor Agnostic

We are not tied to specific model providers. We recommend the right architecture for your jurisdiction and use case - whether it's Anthropic, OpenAI, open-weight, or sovereign European models.

Sustainability Focus

Oversized models for simple tasks are environmentally and financially indefensible. We optimize model selection for specific business impact and carbon footprints, ensuring efficient, sustainable AI operations.

Ready to Secure Your AI?

Let's build AI governance that empowers your team instead of slowing them down.